Microsoft 365 Copilot & Agent Administration Fundamentals - AB-900무료 덤프문제 풀어보기

Explanation:

The correct selections are Information Protection and Data Loss Prevention . Microsoft documents that Microsoft Purview Information Protection helps organizations discover, classify, protect, and govern sensitive information wherever it lives or travels . Microsoft also describes Information Protection as the Purview solution for data classification, sensitivity labels, and encryption , including scenarios across Microsoft 365, on-premises repositories, cloud stores, and even third-party apps through supported extensions. That makes it the correct choice for the requirement to discover and classify sensitive data across multiple platforms .
For the second requirement, Microsoft states that Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention (DLP) helps prevent the unintentional sharing of sensitive items and can block users from prohibited activities , including inappropriate external sharing through services such as SharePoint, OneDrive, Teams, and email.
Microsoft specifically documents DLP scenarios for preventing sensitive items from being shared with external users , which matches the requirement to block users from sharing intellectual property externally.

Explanation:

The correct selections are Yes, No, Yes . Microsoft states that Microsoft 365 Copilot inherits the security, compliance, and privacy policies already configured in Microsoft 365, including Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels and other compliance controls. That makes statement 1 Yes . Microsoft also explains that Copilot respects existing access controls and compliance boundaries rather than bypassing them.
Statement 2 is No because Microsoft 365 Copilot does not ignore Microsoft Purview DLP . Microsoft documents that Copilot honors the protections applied to the underlying content and works within Microsoft
365's existing compliance framework. DLP remains part of the environment governing how sensitive data is protected and shared.
Statement 3 is Yes because Microsoft clearly states that Copilot only surfaces content that a user is already authorized to access through existing Microsoft 365 permissions . Copilot uses Microsoft Graph to ground responses, but it does not grant new permissions or expose content outside the user's allowed scope.
Therefore, the correct hotspot answers are Yes , No , and Yes .

Explanation:

The correct selections are No, Yes, Yes . Statement 1 is No because Microsoft documents tenant controls for web search on or off , but not a general Microsoft 365 Copilot setting to block only selected websites for normal Copilot responses. Microsoft also says it doesn't recommend or support managing Copilot through selective URL or domain blocking at the network level. Website allow/block lists shown in Microsoft documentation apply to Researcher with Computer Use virtual-device settings, not to standard Microsoft
365 Copilot web grounding overall.
Statement 2 is Yes because Microsoft provides the Allow web search in Copilot policy in Cloud Policy service and in the Microsoft 365 admin center, which can disable web search for Microsoft 365 Copilot and Copilot Chat.
Statement 3 is Yes because Microsoft states that admins can block Researcher and Analyst , and agent governance includes a Block action. Microsoft also notes that for Researcher and Analyst, user scoping isn't edited through the usual panel; availability is managed by blocking the selected agent at the tenant level.

설명: (Fast2test 회원만 볼 수 있음)

설명: (Fast2test 회원만 볼 수 있음)

Explanation:

The correct selections are No, Yes, No . Statement 1 is No because Microsoft 365 Copilot is a work service that requires users to sign in with a work or school account . Microsoft documentation for setup and use consistently describes licensing and access in the context of signed-in organizational users, not anonymous access. Statement 2 is Yes because Microsoft documents that administrators can manage self-service purchases and trials in the Microsoft 365 admin center , including allowing or blocking eligible products for self-service acquisition. That means admins can allow self-service purchasing where the product is eligible. Statement 3 is No because Microsoft explicitly states that assigning Microsoft 365 Copilot licenses to cross-tenant users, including guests , isn't supported.

Explanation:

The correct answer is Microsoft SharePoint sites . Microsoft Learn documents that Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels for containers can be applied to Microsoft Teams, Microsoft 365 groups, and SharePoint sites . These labels can control settings such as privacy, external sharing, and unmanaged device access for the labeled site. That is the official Microsoft feature that matches the sentence in the question.
The other options are not the best match for this item. Microsoft 365 Copilot conversations are not the standard object to which admins directly apply a sensitivity label in the way this question is asking. Copilot can honor labels on source content and may display label context in responses, but the selectable resource here is not "Copilot conversations." Azure Blob Storage is also not the intended answer in the Microsoft 365 Copilot and Agent Admin context for Purview sensitivity labels.
So for this hotspot, the sentence is correctly completed with Microsoft SharePoint sites , because Microsoft explicitly supports applying Purview sensitivity labels to SharePoint sites as a container-level labeling capability.

Explanation:
* Microsoft Defender for Office 365 provides protection from phishing and malware attacks. answer:
Yes
* Microsoft Defender for Identity monitors identities in Active Directory domains. answer: Yes
* Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management provides protection for software as a service (SaaS) applications. answer: No The correct selections are Yes, Yes, No . Microsoft documents that Microsoft Defender for Office 365 protects email and collaboration workloads from threats such as phishing and malware , including zero-day malware and business email compromise scenarios. That makes statement 1 Yes .
Statement 2 is also Yes because Microsoft states that Microsoft Defender for Identity monitors identity signals from on-premises Active Directory and related identity infrastructure to detect suspicious activity and identity-based attacks. Microsoft further describes monitoring information generated from your organization's Active Directory, network, and event activities.
Statement 3 is No because Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management is focused on discovering and prioritizing vulnerabilities across devices and assets such as Windows, macOS, Linux, mobile platforms, and network devices. Microsoft's SaaS application protection offering is Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps , not Defender Vulnerability Management.